The Rodney Report: Rhetoric and Realities

  • Nice Financial Regulations You Got There …
  • ‘Lordy, I hope there are tapes’
  • Healthcare in the Senate
  • No spending on Cruel Immigration Policies
  • Frelinghuysen And LGBTQ Equality

 

preview-chat-FrelinghuysenCranky.jpg

Nice Financial Regulations You Got There, America.
Shame If Something Were To Happen To Them...

Last week House Republicans nearly unanimously approved the Financial Choice Act, yet another bill that focuses on rolling back Obama-era regulations. This time, the target is the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, legislation crafted in the wake of the catastrophic financial collapses of 2008. Dodd-Frank was designed specifically to protect consumers and prevent future economic meltdowns. By gutting its essential features, the Choice Act puts hard-working Americans’ financial security at risk.

The Great Recession bled nearly 260,000 jobs from New Jersey alone – a loss that was still not mitigated in 2014, by which time the rest of the country had already seen full job recovery.

Rep. Frelinghuysen’s newsletter offers five reasons he voted to approve the Choice Act. The Rodney Report will look beyond our representative’s rhetoric to examine the facts.

1. Frelinghuysen: Dodd-Frank needs reining in.

Frelinghuysen claims that Dodd-Frank was well-intended, but only succeeded in over-regulating Wall Street and hurting Main Street. Now, there is bipartisan agreement that small banks would benefit from targeted regulatory relief. But it isn’t necessary to blast Dodd-Frank apart to do this.

Read more

The Rodney Report: Done and Undone

  • Ignoring White Supremacist Attacks
  • Paris Accords: Retreat and Recriminations
  • Hurricane Awareness In a Leadership Vacuum
  • Jobs: Now you see them. Now you don’t
  • Intent, Effect And Teen Sexting

Economic news, violence abroad and children’s safety at home held major focus in Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen’s most recent newsletter. Reading it, we sense some interesting subtexts -- and some noteworthy silences, as well.

Ignoring White Supremacist Attacks

Frelinghuysen once again expressed outrage and sympathy for overseas victims of Muslim terrorists, while remaining silent about the growing trend of white supremacist hate crimes in the U.S.

Even President Trump—who rarely condemns violence perpetrated by the racist groups who  fervently support him—belatedly Tweeted in honor of two Oregon men murdered by a white supremacist as they intervened in defense of fellow passengers, including a woman wearing a hijab. And despite Frelinghuysen’s ardent support of service men and women, he was silent on  the Maryland murder of Lt. Richard Collins III, a newly commissioned U.S. Army officer who was stabbed to death by a white supremacist. He also said nothing about the nooses left at the African American History Museum in Washington, DC last week.

It’s appropriate for Frelinghuysen to convey concern and condolences after the attack in Manchester England, and the suicide bombing in Kabul, Afghanistan, which claimed the lives of 90 civilians, including 11 Americans. The violence was horrific and stokes fears that a similar attack could happen here.

The Rodney Report has commended Frelinghuysen for speaking out against anti-Semitic  graffiti and threats against Jewish institutions in New Jersey, but we are angered by his silence on the well-documented rise in hate crimes against Muslims, Latinos and Black people since Trump’s election. Many of these involved perpetrators who explicitly referred to Trump during their attacks or invoked him or his rhetoric in racist graffiti.

Read more

The Rodney Report: Unkind Cuts

  • CB-Ohh No: The AHCA is Really that Awful
  • Slashing the Safety Net
  • Frelinghuysen Vs. DeVos
  • When Constituents Come Calling
  • Arms and Iranpreview-chat-FrelinghuysenCranky.jpg

 

The official start of summer also kicked off a season of budget hearings, in which NJ-11’s Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen as House Appropriations chairman should be expected to play a prominent part.

The dollars and cents issues include the long-awaited Congressional Budget Office scorecard on the AHCA, a troubling list of items on the Trump budget chopping block, and some welcome sparring between Frelinghuysen and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.

CB-Ohhh No: The AHCA Really Is That Awful

During Frelinghuysen’s most recent telephone town hall, many NJ-11 constituents asked why the congressman did not insist on a CBO score before voting to pass the latest version of the American Health Care Act. He didn’t have a definitive answer at that point, but the AHCA scorecard released last week by the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office isn’t pretty. In fact, it’s brutal -- brutal enough to explain why the House leadership didn’t wait for it before pushing the bill to the floor for a vote.

According to the CBO, should the AHCA become law, 23 million more Americans will be uninsured over 10 years, 14 million in the next year alone, compared to the current law.

It gets worse from there.

Read more

The Rodney Report: Nothing Up My Sleeve

  • A week he’d like to forget
  • Is this proposed tax plan really a win?
  • Cook Takes A Look, Downgrades Rodney’s NJ-11 Forecast
  • Protecting Officers, Endangering Citizens
  • What to know about special counsels and select committees

preview-chat-FrelinghuysenCranky.jpg

 

A week he’d like to forget:

It’s was quite a week for our congressman, one that began with news that he’d been caught interfering with the  employment of a constituent and NJ 11th for Change member, and ended with his chance for a 2018 reelection diminished by two publications. In between, the Campaign for Accountability (CfA)  filed a complaint about his note to our member’s employer, in which he called her a “ringleader” at NJ 11th for Change. As CfA director Daniel Stevens said, “If trying to get someone fired for exercising her constitutional right to engage in political activity doesn't reflect poorly on the House, what does?"  Frelinghuysen reportedly told members of The Morristown Jewish Center Sunday morning that he had retained legal counsel in response to these events.  We wonder if this means a statement will finally be forthcoming — in addition to his office’s previous comment that his note was an “innocuous.”

Is this proposed tax plan really a win?

In his weekly E-newsletter Congressman Frelinghuysen touts the tax plan being mapped out in the House, as “pro-jobs.”  A closer look shows that it’s a big win for corporations and the top one percent of income earners.  Corporate tax rates would be chopped by more than half under the president’s plan, from 35 percent  to under 15 in the House plan.  The top rate for high-income earners will be sliced from 40 to to 33 percent.

 
Read more